[Riyad Kalla]

nat, I have passed your comments/links off to management, we’ll see where we go from there. Thank you for all your feedback. I can’t promise this will happen but it will certainly be evaluated.

[seyin]

What 2% Maybes? Outrageous! Gimme their addresses let me pay them a visit. Portlet? Yes please.

[frantuma]

Yes to portlets!

[rivetlogic]

Having portlet support in MyEclipse will be the deciding factor in whether or not we continue to purchase the IDE. It is that crucial for some companies and I think it would be a very smart move on your end if you fully support it.

Many companies both large, medium, and small are starting to include portlet development in their software departments. I give this feature a big fat YES on the polls.

[Tero Ripattila]

I’ll give my vote for portlets. Having support for portlets is a true must, IMHO.

[rm1000]

having wizards to do portlets is great.. i really appreciate this can of features

tks a lot…

[Mike Zhang]

I ended up having to go and use the Sun Java Studio Enterprise 8 to do my portlets because it is a lot easier to use a template for portlet development and when I talked to MyEclipse about it they basically gave me the run around saying that it might come on a future release but I don’t see it on the road map and I have yet to see any progress towards it. It is very disappointing seeing so many people request it and basically nothing happens. I do understand the point of developing without templetes but the templetes help develop a lot faster and time is money.

[mhills]

I am casting my vote on new supported features for MyEclipse not in v5.1. I love MyEclipse, but it falls short in supporting a couple technologies we want to use; this prohibits adoption of MyEclipse in the office.

It is important to us that the IDE support JSF applications with (1) Faclets, and (2) the Porlet API. Specifically we want to use the LifeRay portal.

Also would like to see WYSIWYG GUI improvements in JSP editor…and one for Facelets of course

[FabianRomero]

This message has not been recovered.

[faizi_92]

This message has not been recovered.

[lmas]

Will you provide portlet support?

[Riyad Kalla]

We are planning on adding portlet support that is compliant with the JSR-168 spec soon. I believe management said either in 6.5 or 7.0

[rajsriram]

It will be great if you can add portlet support for JSR 168 and JSR 286 portlets. It will certainly boost your revenues significantly. Right now, there is not a TOOL which can provide support for portlets.

If you can add debugging capability to Portlets with one of the portlet containers (for ex: liferay or pluto) it can beat the crap out of RAD. Portlet debugging is horrible in RAD and it just need too many resources.

Go for it Myeclipse.

Cheers,

Raj

[rajsriram]

@rajsriram wrote:

It will be great if you can add portlet support for JSR 168 and JSR 286 portlets. It will certainly boost your revenues significantly. Right now, there is not a TOOL which can provide support for portlets.

If you can add debugging capability to Portlets with one of the portlet containers (for ex: liferay or pluto) it can beat the crap out of RAD. Portlet debugging is horrible in RAD and it just need too many resources.

Go for it Myeclipse.

Cheers,

Raj

Till myeclipse provides the portlet support, you can try lomboz built on top of eclipse 3.3. It’s pretty cool. It does support JSR 168 portlet creation for exo and liferay portlet containers.

http://lomboz.objectweb.org/downloads/drops/S-3.3RC1-200708181505/notes.html

Cheers

[wayne]

This message has not been recovered.

[Author]

Posts