- This topic has 24 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
Brian Fernandes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 12, 2017 at 5:12 am #526317
support-piotrParticipantgjt3,
I have identified the problem and fixed it. The fix will be available in the next release of MyEclipse 2017 – CI 7. You have mentioned that you are using MEB 2016. Is migrating to MEB 2017 an option? We are not planning any more releases of MEB 2016. However, we can figure out something, if you are not able to switch.
Best regards,
Piotr TomiakJune 12, 2017 at 6:16 am #526322
gjt3ParticipantWe are right in the middle of migrating groups over to 2016. Dont believe we will be switching to 2017 soon. For the current EJB issues:
1. What was identified as the problem
2. What in the way of a fix can be done for our situationJune 12, 2017 at 8:51 am #526346
gjt3ParticipantBased on my recent comments, can we schedule a meeting to discuss since we are in critical migration stage.
June 12, 2017 at 2:09 pm #526411
Brian FernandesModeratorTo answer your questions specifically:
1) The problem is caused by the fact that our code does not correctly set up the environment in which IBM’s RMICOperation executes – leading it to use the wrong JDK in some circumstances; this is what is happening in your case.
2) The code that must be corrected resides in a single plugin, which we must update for your IDE to work correctly. Basically, we can supply an update site containing the fixed plugin, which you will need to use to apply the fix (we will provide detailed steps).
Could you tell us how many users will be affected by this problem, and need the fix? If you do use MyEclipse Secure / Secure Delivery Center to distribute MyEclipse, we could provide a different set of steps that should make the process of applying the fix much more straightforward for each end user.
My recommendations going forward would be:
a) We supply an update site with instructions to allow a single user to apply the fix and verify that it does work for your specific case.
b) Based on your distribution mechanism, we can schedule a call to discuss and help with efficient rollout of the fix.Do let us know if this works for you.
June 13, 2017 at 11:20 am #526516
gjt3ParticipantContext of email reply:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
To answer your questions specifically:
1) The problem is caused by the fact that our code does not correctly set up the environment in which IBM’s RMICOperation executes – leading it to use the wrong JDK in some circumstances; this is what is happening in your case.
2) The code that must be corrected resides in a single plugin, which we must update for your IDE to work correctly. Basically, we can supply an update site containing the fixed plugin, which you will need to use to apply the fix (we will provide detailed steps).
Could you tell us how many users will be affected by this problem, and need the fix? If you do use MyEclipse Secure / Secure Delivery Center to distribute MyEclipse, we could provide a different set of steps that should make the process of applying the fix much more straightforward for each end user.
My recommendations going forward would be:
a) We supply an update site with instructions to allow a single user to apply the fix and verify that it does work for your specific case.
b) Based on your distribution mechanism, we can schedule a call to discuss and help with efficient rollout of the fix.After discussing this internally, we agree the plugin fix is best option. Please advise timelines -anticipating receipt by Friday 6/16. If a meeting is required to discuss, please call me.
June 13, 2017 at 12:14 pm #526524
Brian FernandesModeratorGregory,
Could you tell us how many users will be affected by this problem, and need the fix? If you do use MyEclipse Secure / Secure Delivery Center to distribute MyEclipse, we could provide a different set of steps that should make the process of applying the fix much more straightforward for each end user.
I’m assuming you are delivering MyEclipse with Secure delivery center (SDC)? And, can you confirm that your teams are using the 2016 Stable 1.0 version? This would affect how we deliver the fix.
June 13, 2017 at 2:01 pm #526530
gjt3ParticipantFrom last email:
Could you tell us how many users will be affected by this problem, and need the fix? If you do use MyEclipse Secure / Secure Delivery Center to distribute MyEclipse, we could provide a different set of steps that should make the process of applying the fix much more straightforward for each end user.
I’m assuming you are delivering MyEclipse with Secure delivery center (SDC)? And, can you confirm that your teams are using the 2016 Stable 1.0 version? This would affect how we deliver the fix.
1. We are using 2016 Stable 1
2. We use SDC
3. Number of users. Currently I have 3 internal developers who are having the EJB issue. There could another 1-100+June 14, 2017 at 11:51 am #526723
gjt3ParticipantLooking for target release date on plug-in
June 14, 2017 at 2:16 pm #526786
Brian FernandesModeratorGregory,
The fix has passed one round of testing – we’ll be doing some additional testing tomorrow. We should be able to deliver the fix on either 6/15 or 6/16.
June 16, 2017 at 6:17 am #526992
Brian FernandesModeratorGregory,
I sent you an email yesterday with the fix as well as notes on how to apply it. Can you please confirm that you received it?
Thanks!
-
AuthorPosts